Swing v. Inhabitants of the Upper Alloways Creek

10 N.J.L. 58
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ch. Justice.

Let the rule be granted. Ii appears that the costs have been taxed and demanded. It is a clear .principle, that a party cannot commence a subsequent action in the same court, for the same cause of action, until die costs of the first action are paid; and the rule is thp same as to all courts within the same jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swing v. Inhabitants of the Upper Alloways Creek, 10 N.J.L. 58 (N.J. 1828).

10 N.J.L. 58 (Swing v. Inhabitants of the Upper Alloways Creek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sebolt v. National Bank of New Jersey
65 A.2d 868 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)