Swinford v. State
This text of 651 So. 2d 225 (Swinford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse Appellant’s sentence with direction that the trial court modify special conditions of probation (6) and (13) to conform to the oral pronouncements at sentencing. To that end, the conditions shall be modified to clarify that that portion of the conditions restricting the use of intoxicants and requiring breath and blood tests apply only to the extent that they are imposed incident to any treatment that is based on the ordered substance abuse evaluation. The other portion of condition (6) restricting Appellant from visiting places where substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed, or used is a valid condition which need not be orally pronounced in open court. Jaworski v. State, 650 So.2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 So. 2d 225, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1991, 1995 WL 80035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swinford-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.