Swindle v. State

837 S.W.2d 447, 310 Ark. 399, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 526, 1992 WL 293471
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 14, 1992
DocketCR 92-820
StatusPublished

This text of 837 S.W.2d 447 (Swindle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swindle v. State, 837 S.W.2d 447, 310 Ark. 399, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 526, 1992 WL 293471 (Ark. 1992).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

James Monty Swindle, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, James R. Henry, admits by motion and brief that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 S.W.2d 447, 310 Ark. 399, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 526, 1992 WL 293471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swindle-v-state-ark-1992.