Swindle v. Maxwell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Swindle v. Maxwell

213 So. 2d 602, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5173

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 4, 1968·No. No. 2096·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal which challenges certain trial court decisions in the discovery area. We have examined the record in light of appellant’s contentions and are not able to say that the trial court abused its discretion in the premises or that appellant has demonstrated any reversible error. See Parker v. Parker, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 498, and Orlowitz v. Orlowitz, Fla.1967, 199 So.2d 97.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., OWEN, J., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal which challenges certain trial court decisions in the discovery area. We have examined the record in light of appellant’s contentions and are not able to say that the trial court abused its discretion in the premises or that appellant has demonstrated any reversible error. See Parker v. Parker, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 498, and Orlowitz v. Orlowitz, Fla.1967, 199 So.2d 97.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., OWEN, J., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.

Swindle v. Maxwell, 213 So. 2d 602, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

213 So. 2d 602 (Swindle v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related