Swindle v. Maxwell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Swindle v. Maxwell

213 So. 2d 602, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5173

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 4, 1968

DocketNo. 2096

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 So. 2d 602 (Swindle v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swindle v. Maxwell, 213 So. 2d 602, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal which challenges certain trial court decisions in the discovery area. We have examined the record in light of appellant’s contentions and are not able to say that the trial court abused its discretion in the premises or that appellant has demonstrated any reversible error. See Parker v. Parker, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 498, and Orlowitz v. Orlowitz, Fla.1967, 199 So.2d 97.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., OWEN, J., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal which challenges certain trial court decisions in the discovery area. We have examined the record in light of appellant’s contentions and are not able to say that the trial court abused its discretion in the premises or that appellant has demonstrated any reversible error. See Parker v. Parker, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 498, and Orlowitz v. Orlowitz, Fla.1967, 199 So.2d 97.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., OWEN, J., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 So. 2d 602, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swindle-v-maxwell-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack