Swims v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Swims v. State

413 S.W.3d 733, 2013 WL 6092519, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 2013·No. No. ED 99397·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joe C. Swims, III appeals from the motion court’s Judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joe C. Swims, III appeals from the motion court’s Judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Swims v. State, 413 S.W.3d 733, 2013 WL 6092519, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

413 S.W.3d 733 (Swims v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.