Swimmer v. Silverman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Swimmer v. Silverman

128 Misc. 444

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 128 Misc. 444 (Swimmer v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swimmer v. Silverman, 128 Misc. 444 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from order denying motion for summary judgment dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Mun. Ct. Code, § 154, as amd. by Laws of 1925, chap. 637.) Pinchot v. Roskam, (123 Misc. 253) and State Realty Co. v. Post (Id. 925), the cases cited by appellants, do not hold to the contrary. Those cases were in the City Court of the City of New York and the section of the Municipal Court Code, above cited, was not applicable.

Present — Cropsey, MacCrate and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal from order denying motion for summary judgment dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Mun. Ct. Code, § 154, as amd. by Laws of 1925, chap. 637.) Pinchot v. Roskam, (123 Misc. 253) and State Realty Co. v. Post (Id. 925), the cases cited by appellants, do not hold to the contrary. Those cases were in the City Court of the City of New York and the section of the Municipal Court Code, above cited, was not applicable.

Present — Cropsey, MacCrate and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 Misc. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swimmer-v-silverman-nyappterm-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack