Swim v. Leeber

105 S.E.2d 136, 143 W. Va. 782, 1958 W. Va. LEXIS 52
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 7, 1958
Docket10975
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 S.E.2d 136 (Swim v. Leeber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swim v. Leeber, 105 S.E.2d 136, 143 W. Va. 782, 1958 W. Va. LEXIS 52 (W. Va. 1958).

Opinion

Havmond, President:

This statutory proceeding based on Section 7, Article 6, Chapter 6, Code, 1931, was instituted in the Circuit Court of Raleigh County, West Virginia, on November *783 19, 1957, by the petitioners, R. C. Swim, Thomas Rose, J. D. Swim, W. W. Vines and Albany Milam, five voters of that county, to remove from office the defendants, A. P. Leeber, H. Dale Covey and Sherman C. Trail, members of the Board of Education of the County of Raleigh, for alleged violations of Section 15, Article 10, Chapter 61, and for official misconduct and malfeasance in office in violation of Sections 5, 6 and 7, Article 6, Chapter 6, Code, 1931, and of Article IV, Section 6, of the Constitution of this State.

The charges filed by the petitioners are set forth in seven separate specifications against the defendant Leeber, seven separate specifications against the defendant Covey, and two separate specifications against the defendant Trail. Upon the filing of the petition a summons, returnable November 25, 1957, was issued by the clerk of the circuit court and duly served upon the defendants. The charges, though filed and incorporated in the petition, were not entered of record by the circuit court.

All the defendants filed their joint and several demurrers and the defendants Leeber and Covey filed their separate pleas of the statute of limitations to the petition. The circuit court sustained the demurrer to each of the specifications against the defendant Leeber except specification 4 of the petition and overruled the1 demurrer as to that specification; sustained the demurrer to each of the specifications against the defendant Covey, except specifications 1 and 2 of the petition and overruled the demurrer as to those two specifications; and sustained the demurrer to all the specifications against the defendant Trail and dismissed the proceeding as to him.

The charge against the defendant Leeber in specification 4 of the petition is that on or about May 6, 1957, he became indirectly pecuniarily interested in ¡the award of a continuing contract of employment between the board of education and his wife, Helen Leeber; that as a member of the board he had a voice and influence; *784 that at a meeting of the board on May 6, 1957, he voted affirmatively on a motion to hire her to teach at Beck-ley Junior High School in Beckley, West Virginia; that he was indirectly pecuniarily interested in the proceeds of the foregoing continuing contract of employment of his wife; and that his action violated Section 15, Article 10, Chapter 61, Code, 1931, and constituted official misconduct in office.

The charge against the defendant Covey in specification 1 of the petition is identical in character with the charge against the defendant Leeber in specification 4 of the petition and relates to a meeting of the board on June 6, 1957; and the charge in specification 2 of the petition is that on June 6, 1957, Covey executed in behalf of the board of education, as its president, a contract of employment with his wife, Margaret Covey, in violation of the provisions of Sections 5, 6 and 7, Article 6, Chapter 6, Code, 1931, and that such contract was a contract in which, as a member of the board, he was pecuniarily interested, in violation of Section 15, Article 10, Chapter 61, Code, 1931.

The proceeding was heard upon the charges of the petition in specification 4 against the defendant Leeber and in specifications 1 and 2 against the defendant Covey, the separate pleas and answers of those defendants, and evidence introduced in behalf of the petitioners.

The defendants Leeber and Covey did not introduce any evidence but moved the court to strike the evidence introduced by the petitioners and to1 dismiss the proceedings against the defendants. The [court overruled the motion and by its judgment, entered February 7, 1958, found the defendant Leeber guilty of the charge against him in specification 4 and the defendant Covey guilty of the charges against him in specifications 1 and 2, ordered them to cease and desist from performing any duties as members of the Board of Education of the County of Raleigh, removed them from office as members of the board, and required them forthwith to surrender and *785 deliver to the remaining members of the bloard or the superintendent of schools of Raleigh County all records and property of the board then in the custody of the defendants. The court also suspended execution of the judgment for a period of thirty days to enable the defendants to apply to this Court for a writ of error but refused to suspend the order of removal or to permit the defendants to continue to act as members of the board. To that judgment this Court granted this writ of error and supersedeas on March 24, 1958, upon the application of the defendants Leeber and Covey.

After this Court granted this writ of error and super-sedeas the Board of Education of Raleigh County on March 26, 1958 held a meeting, at which a quorum was present, and by order enteral of record attempted to select two other persons as members of the board to serve in the place and stead of the defendants Leeber and Covey in an effort to fill the purported vacancies created by the judgment of the circuit court in removing them from office.

On April 8, 1958, Leeber and Covey, as petitioners, instituted a proceeding in mandamus in this Court against the Board of Education of Raleigh County, the other members of the board, and the two persons selected by the board as members in the place and stead of Leeber and Covey. Upon a hearing of .that proceeding this Court, on June 3, 1958, issued a writ of mandamus which commanded and directed the defendants in that proceeding to recognize and admit Leeber and Covey as members of the board and to cease to interfere with them in the performance of their duties and functions as such members.

By their assignments of error the petitioners seek reversal of the final judgment of the circuit court on substantially these grounds: (1) The charges against the petitioners, though reduced to writing, were not entered of record by the court; and (2) the charges contained in the specifications of which the petitioners were *786 found guilty do not state valid grounds for their removal from office and .the evidence is not sufficient to establish the misconduct charged against them.

The defendants contend that, though .the charges were not entered of record, this proceeding should not be dismissed for that reason; that the charges and the evidence to- support them are sufficient to sustain the judgment of the circuit court; and that the judgment should be affirmed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daugherty v. Day
116 S.E.2d 131 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E.2d 136, 143 W. Va. 782, 1958 W. Va. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swim-v-leeber-wva-1958.