Swiler v. RSJ Ventures, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedJanuary 7, 2025
Docket2:24-cv-00661
StatusUnknown

This text of Swiler v. RSJ Ventures, LLC (Swiler v. RSJ Ventures, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swiler v. RSJ Ventures, LLC, (M.D. Fla. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

BLAIR SWILER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:24-cv-661-SPC-KCD

RSJ VENTURES, LLC,

Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 37) and Defendant’s Response to the TRO request (Doc. 38). For the below reasons, the Court denies the request for a TRO and takes under advisement the request for a preliminary injunction. The primary difference between a TRO and preliminary injunction is that a court may grant a TRO motion without notice to the opposing party or an opportunity to be heard. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)-(b). Accordingly, TROs “should be restricted to serving their underlying purpose of preserving the status quo and preventing irreparable harm just so long as is necessary to hold a [preliminary-injunction] hearing, and no longer.” Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Bhd. of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers Loc. No. 70 of Alameda Cnty., 415 U.S. 423, 439 (1974).

Plaintiff initiated this action nearly six months ago. Defendant has appeared, was served with the injunction motion, and filed an abbreviated response to the TRO request on the same day. (Doc. 38). Given this posture, the immediate ex parte relief provided by a TRO is inappropriate. See Harley’s

Hope Found. v. Harley’s Dream, No. 22-CV-0136-WJM-STV, 2022 WL 824415, at *1 (D. Colo. Mar. 18, 2022). The Court denies the TRO request and takes the preliminary-injunction request under advisement. Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 37) is DENIED in part as to its request for a TRO. The request for preliminary injunction remains under

advisement. 2. On or before January 17, 2025, Defendant must respond to Plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunction. 3. The Court will set a preliminary-injunction hearing by separate

notice. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on January 7, 2025.

tite POLSTER otal UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Swiler v. RSJ Ventures, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swiler-v-rsj-ventures-llc-flmd-2025.