Swiger v. United Valley Insurance

Fourth Circuit

Swiger v. United Valley Insurance

189 F. App'x 234

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2006·No. No. 05-2017·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel J. Swiger and Brenda Frazier Swiger appeal the district court’s order denying their request for attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Swiger v. United Valley Ins. Co., No. CA-05-52-1-IMK (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Samuel J. Swiger and Brenda Frazier Swiger appeal the district court’s order denying their request for attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Swiger v. United Valley Ins. Co., No. CA-05-52-1-IMK (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Swiger v. United Valley Insurance, 189 F. App'x 234 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

189 F. App'x 234 (Swiger v. United Valley Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.