Swift v. Wells
2 How. Pr. 79
Opinion
Denied the motion, on the ground that one bill of goods, containing fifty different items, delivered at the same time, was in fact but one item.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swift v. Wells, 2 How. Pr. 79 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).
2 How. Pr. 79 (Swift v. Wells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cassidy v. . McFarland
34 N.E. 893 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
Van Orden v. Tilden
13 Daly 396 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1885)
Druse v. Horter
16 N.W. 14 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1883)
McMartin v. Bingham
27 Iowa 234 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1869)
Batchelor v. Albany City Insurance
6 Abb. Pr. 240 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1869)