Swift v. Saulsberry
109 P. 305, 59 Wash. 163, 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1155
Opinion
The appellant has moved to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the appeal bond is not in form or substance such as to render the appeal effectual.
The point relied upon is that the bond is conditioned both as an appeal and supersedeas, and is in the penal sum of $£00. The motion- is granted. Hassett v. Fraternal Brotherhood, ante p. 161, 109 Pac. 805.
The dismissal of the appeal results in no prejudice to the appellant, as we would be required to affirm the case on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swift v. Saulsberry, 109 P. 305, 59 Wash. 163, 1910 Wash. LEXIS 1155 (Wash. 1910).
109 P. 305 (Swift v. Saulsberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Michaels v. Levinson
144 P. 903 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)