Swift v. Richardson Sports

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedOctober 30, 2003
DocketI.C. NO. 013054
StatusPublished

This text of Swift v. Richardson Sports (Swift v. Richardson Sports) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swift v. Richardson Sports, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2003).

Opinion

***********
This matter was reviewed by the Full Commission based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Phillips, along with the briefs and arguments on appeal. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or to amend the prior Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission adopts and affirms the Deputy Commissioner's holding with some modification and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner on 12 November 2002 as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act at all relevant times and all claims and notices as required by law were properly and timely filed regarding all parties.

2. An employee-employer relationship existed between the Plaintiff and Defendant-Employer at all times relevant hereto.

3. On December 26, 1999, plaintiff sustained an alleged injury by accident to his right leg while employed with the Defendant-Employer.

4. As of the date of the accident, December 26, 1999, Legion Insurance Company was the carrier on the risk and Cameron Harris was the adjusting agent for the employer and carrier.

5. Exhibits indexed as "Stipulated Exhibits to Pre-Trial Agreement" attached at Tab 1 through 16 in addition to a videotape were received into evidence without need of further authentication subject to the right of either party to take the testimony of any of the witnesses identified in said records.

***********
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff was born on February 28, 1974 and at the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner was 28 years of age.

2. Plaintiff graduated from high school in the Tipton, Tennessee area. He attended college at Austin Peay State, but did not graduate.

3. In 1996, Plaintiff was not drafted as a professional football player but did, nevertheless, make the San Diego Chargers professional football team in the National Football League ("NFL") as a free agent. His primary duties, as throughout his career, were working on special teams such as the kick-off team, as well as the teams used to attempt to block extra points, punts, and field goals. He also played the position of cornerback on defense.

4. After playing two seasons with the San Diego Chargers, plaintiff was signed with the Carolina Panthers and held relatively the same responsibilities, those of playing cornerback as well as on special teams.

5. Plaintiff played with the Panthers for the 1998 1999 season as well as the 1999 2000 season.

6. Plaintiff, who is approximately 5'10'' tall, weighed between 170 and 180 pounds when he was playing professional football. The positions he played on special teams, as well as playing cornerback, required him to have the speed necessary to stop, start, cut and generally keep up with the offensive teams' receivers, some of the fastest people to play the game of professional football.

7. On or about July 27, 1999, plaintiff signed to play for the 1999 2000 season with the Carolina Panthers in return for payment of $325,000.00 payable in seventeen equal installments. The regular season is made up of 16 games but actually lasts for 17 weeks because one week, the "bye-week," is reserved for not playing.

8. In the 15th game of the 16-game regular season, while playing on special teams in a game against the Pittsburgh Steelers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, plaintiff was lined up on the end of the line to attempt to get around the opposing team's players and block an extra point attempt. On that particular play, the opposing team bobbled the ball and the play broke down. In an attempt to get to the ball, Swift was knocked to the ground and at least one other player, and possibly two, fell on the back of his leg not only breaking his right fibula but also severely tearing the tendons in his ankle.

9. It was unexpected and unusual for a player to fall on Swift in this way so as to break his fibula and cause such a tear in his ankle tendon. At the time of injury, Swift was taking all reasonable measures to protect himself from injury given the nature of the game. At the same time, Swift was required to do what he was doing when injured and had no choice but to do it as best he could notwithstanding the risk of injury.

10. On December 27, 1999, after being flown back to North Carolina, plaintiff underwent surgery and insertion of hardware by Dr. D'Alessandro, the Panthers' team doctor, to repair his broken leg and ankle. He then returned to the Memphis, Tennessee area where he underwent physical therapy at Campbell Clinic.

11. When Plaintiff's contract for the 1999 2000 season expired, it was not renewed by the Panthers in that he was still on crutches and undergoing physical therapy for the serious and permanent injury to his ankle.

12. On or about March 9, 2000, Plaintiff returned to Dr. D'Alessandro, the Panthers' team physician who performed the original surgery, to have some, but not all, of the hardware removed from his leg. Plaintiff then returned to Memphis to continue his physical therapy.

13. Although his leg and ankle had not fully recovered, Swift, who had planned on making a career out of working in the NFL as a professional football player, tried out for another NFL professional football team, the Jacksonville Jaguars. Although he had continued symptoms with his ankle, he made the team. After his first game with the Jaguars, on September 5, 2000 plaintiff was released from the team because of limitations of speed and ability to maneuver as a result of the impairment from the ankle injury sustained while working with the Carolina Panthers. Swift's compensable work-related limitations made him more likely to be dismissed from the team relative to his teammates for reasons of relative performance.

14. Thereafter, several other professional football teams asked plaintiff to participate in tryouts, but he was unable to perform as necessary to make a team because of the symptoms associated with his injury by accident that occurred while employed with the Carolina Panthers, a North Carolina based team, on December 26, 1999.

15. The nature and severity of the injury sustained on December 26, 1999 were such that despite a lengthy period of rehabilitation, the injury was career-ending.

16. Finally, after having to give up pursing a career in the NFL as a football player because of the impairment and limitations of his ability associated with his ankle and leg injury, plaintiff next became employed outside of the NFL at the following jobs and positions with associated wages as follows: from Late November, 2000 until January 2001, plaintiff worked as an analyst for "Protein Technologies" making $12 per hour; from April 2001 through October 2002, plaintiff worked for "Uniform People" as a sales representative with an annual salary of approximately $35,000 per year; and beginning in October of 2002 until the present, plaintiff has been self-employed selling used computer equipment making an anticipated income of approximately $40,000 annually.

17. All of the jobs listed above reflect an honest attempt at earnings at the full exercise of his wage earning capacity outside of the NFL in that he was no longer capable of working as a player in the NFL.

18. In the NFL, a player's salary is based on his contract.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larramore v. Richardson Sports Ltd. Partners
540 S.E.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Swift v. Richardson Sports, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swift-v-richardson-sports-ncworkcompcom-2003.