Swift v. Lefever

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Swift v. Lefever

122 A.D.2d 910, 505 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 20, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.2d 910 (Swift v. Lefever) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swift v. Lefever, 122 A.D.2d 910, 505 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating Samuel Coleman as a candidate in the Liberal Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1986, for the public office of Member of the New York State Assembly, 93rd Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Edelstein, J.), dated August 12, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, a review of the respondent Samuel Coleman’s certificate of acceptance clearly shows that he accepted the designation of the Liberal Party to be a candidate for the public office of Member of the New York State Assembly from the 93rd Assembly District. Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating Samuel Coleman as a candidate in the Liberal Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1986, for the public office of Member of the New York State Assembly, 93rd Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Edelstein, J.), dated August 12, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding.

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, a review of the respondent Samuel Coleman’s certificate of acceptance clearly shows that he accepted the designation of the Liberal Party to be a candidate for the public office of Member of the New York State Assembly from the 93rd Assembly District. Brown, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.2d 910, 505 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swift-v-lefever-nyappdiv-1986.