Swift v. Eames Vacuum Brake Co.

Second Circuit

Swift v. Eames Vacuum Brake Co.

75 F. 589, 21 C.C.A. 447, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2934

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 22, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 75 F. 589 (Swift v. Eames Vacuum Brake Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swift v. Eames Vacuum Brake Co., 75 F. 589, 21 C.C.A. 447, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2934 (2d Cir. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as no defense of want of novelty, based on tlie prior patent to Bassett, has been interposed by the defendant, and we are unable to adopt the narrow construction of the first claim of the patent in suit contended for in behalf of the defendant, we are constrained to affirm the decree of the court below, and do not deem it necessary to add anything to tlie observations in tlie opinion of Judge Wheeler. The decree is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as no defense of want of novelty, based on tlie prior patent to Bassett, has been interposed by the defendant, and we are unable to adopt the narrow construction of the first claim of the patent in suit contended for in behalf of the defendant, we are constrained to affirm the decree of the court below, and do not deem it necessary to add anything to tlie observations in tlie opinion of Judge Wheeler. The decree is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 F. 589, 21 C.C.A. 447, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swift-v-eames-vacuum-brake-co-ca2-1895.