Swift v. Craighead

75 A. 975, 76 N.J. Eq. 339, 6 Buchanan 339, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 326
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1909
StatusPublished

This text of 75 A. 975 (Swift v. Craighead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swift v. Craighead, 75 A. 975, 76 N.J. Eq. 339, 6 Buchanan 339, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 326 (N.J. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance■—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Beed, Trenohard, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Congdon—12.

For reversal—Swayze, Parker—-2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 A. 975, 76 N.J. Eq. 339, 6 Buchanan 339, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swift-v-craighead-nj-1909.