Swift v. Collins
1 Denio 659
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided September 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
It is not necessary to inquire whether this case is within the words of the statute, (2 R. S. 619, tit. 2, § 1,) for the power to require security for costs is inherent in the court. (The People v. Oneida C. P., 18 Wend. 652.)
The real plaintiff in this case is beyond the jurisdiction of the court, and the nominal plaintiffs are insolvent. He should not he allowed to sue in their names, for his own benefit, without ■giving adequate security to pay costs if the defendants succeed in their defence.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swift v. Collins, 1 Denio 659 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
1 Denio 659 (Swift v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bachman v. Hausman
241 A.D. 153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Myrus v. Commonwealth Fuel Co.
120 Misc. 201 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
Gary v. Chambers Bros. Furriers, Inc.
103 Misc. 257 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Harrigan v. Gilchrist
99 N.W. 909 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1904)
McLaughlin v. Kipp
82 A.D. 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Knoch v. Funke
19 N.Y.S. 242 (Superior Court of New York, 1892)
Knoch v. Funke
28 Abb. N. Cas. 240 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1892)
Forman v. Campbell
9 F. Cas. 450 (E.D. New York, 1878)
Keller v. Townsend
2 Abb. N. Cas. 432 (New York Supreme Court, 1877)
In re Blaisdell
42 How. Pr. 274 (S.D. New York, 1872)
Dyer v. Dunivan
3 How. Pr. 135 (New York Supreme Court, 1847)