Swift v. Blair's

12 Wend. 278
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 5, 1835
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 12 Wend. 278 (Swift v. Blair's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swift v. Blair's, 12 Wend. 278 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1835).

Opinion

[279]*279 By the, Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

An executor or administrator is not bound to arbitrate; he can only be asked to refer, in the manner prescribed by the statute. This motion, therefore, must be denied. When it is sought to subject an executor or administrator to costs, inasmuch as they must come out of his own pocket, if granted, for it is only for neglect of duty that he can be subjected to costs, the party asking for the rule must bring himself strictly within the statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmitz v. . Langhaar
88 N.Y. 503 (New York Court of Appeals, 1882)
Buckhout v. Hunt
16 How. Pr. 407 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Cruikshank v. Cruikshank
9 How. Pr. 350 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)
Doan v. Hine's administrators
22 Wend. 639 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)
Harvey v. Skillman's
22 Wend. 571 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)
Butts & Havens v. Genung
5 Paige Ch. 254 (New York Court of Chancery, 1835)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Wend. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swift-v-blairs-nysupct-1835.