Swift v. Bethel

355 U.S. 40, 78 S. Ct. 120

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 12, 1957·No. 437·Published

Opinion

355 U.S. 40 (1957)

SWIFT ET AL., TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, BETHEL UNIT,
v.
BOROUGH OF BETHEL, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

No. 437.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 12, 1957. APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

Hayden C. Covington for appellants.

Arthur W. Henderson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

355 U.S. 40 (1957)

SWIFT ET AL., TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, BETHEL UNIT,
v.
BOROUGH OF BETHEL, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

No. 437.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 12, 1957. APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

Hayden C. Covington for appellants.

Arthur W. Henderson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Swift v. Bethel, 355 U.S. 40, 78 S. Ct. 120 (1957).

Pincite

355 U.S. 40 (Swift v. Bethel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.