Swift v. Bethel
355 U.S. 40, 78 S. Ct. 120
This text of 355 U.S. 40 (Swift v. Bethel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Swift v. Bethel, 355 U.S. 40, 78 S. Ct. 120 (1957).
Opinion
SWIFT ET AL., TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, BETHEL UNIT,
v.
BOROUGH OF BETHEL, PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Hayden C. Covington for appellants.
Arthur W. Henderson for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
355 U.S. 40, 78 S. Ct. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swift-v-bethel-scotus-1957.