Swift v. Arents
4 Cal. 390
This text of 4 Cal. 390 (Swift v. Arents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Swift v. Arents, 4 Cal. 390 (Cal. 1854).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The demurrer was improperly sustained. The bill is filed by a creditor asking relief against fraudulent transfers and concealment of his property by the debtor. This is a substantial ground of equity jurisdiction, and we see no reason for refusing to entertain it.
Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCutcheon v. Superior Court
24 P.2d 911 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Rapp v. Whittier
45 P. 703 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Watkins v. Wilhoit
35 P. 646 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
Stock-Growers' Bank v. Newton
13 Colo. 245 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1889)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Cal. 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swift-v-arents-cal-1854.