Swift v. Arents
4 Cal. 390
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The demurrer was improperly sustained. The bill is filed by a creditor asking relief against fraudulent transfers and concealment of his property by the debtor. This is a substantial ground of equity jurisdiction, and we see no reason for refusing to entertain it.
Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swift v. Arents, 4 Cal. 390 (Cal. 1854).
4 Cal. 390 (Swift v. Arents) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCutcheon v. Superior Court
24 P.2d 911 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Rapp v. Whittier
45 P. 703 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Watkins v. Wilhoit
35 P. 646 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
Stock-Growers' Bank v. Newton
13 Colo. 245 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1889)