Swift & Company v. Smigel
289 A.2d 793, 60 N.J. 348, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 248
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the Appellate Division opinion. (115 N. J. Super. 391).
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swift & Company v. Smigel, 289 A.2d 793, 60 N.J. 348, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 1972).
289 A.2d 793 (Swift & Company v. Smigel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Housatonic Bank v. Fleming
560 A.2d 97 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)