Swift & Company v. Smigel

289 A.2d 793, 60 N.J. 348, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 248
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 24, 1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the Appellate Division opinion. (115 N. J. Super. 391).

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swift & Company v. Smigel, 289 A.2d 793, 60 N.J. 348, 1972 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 1972).

289 A.2d 793 (Swift & Company v. Smigel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Housatonic Bank v. Fleming
560 A.2d 97 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)