Swift & Co. v. J. B. Jeffrey & Son

250 S.W. 791, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 98
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 19, 1923
DocketNo. 1467.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 250 S.W. 791 (Swift & Co. v. J. B. Jeffrey & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swift & Co. v. J. B. Jeffrey & Son, 250 S.W. 791, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 98 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

HIGGINS, J.

There is but one assignment, which is to the effect that the judgment is contrary to the undisputed evidence.

There is copied into the transcript what purports to be a statement of facts signed by counsel for appellant, but it is not signed by appellees nor their counsel; neither is it approved by the trial court. This so-called statement of facts cannot be considered. Texas, etc., v. Gonzales (Tex. Civ. App.) 211 S. W. 347; Scaling v. Collins (Tex. Civ. App.) 214 S. W. 624.

In the absence of a statement of facts, is must be presumed that the evidence supported the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Magee v. Magee
272 S.W. 252 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 S.W. 791, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swift-co-v-j-b-jeffrey-son-texapp-1923.