Swift & Co. v. J. B. Jeffrey & Son

250 S.W. 791, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 98
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 19, 1923·No. No. 1467.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

HIGGINS, J.

There is but one assignment, which is to the effect that the judgment is contrary to the undisputed evidence.

There is copied into the transcript what purports to be a statement of facts signed by counsel for appellant, but it is not signed by appellees nor their counsel; neither is it approved by the trial court. This so-called statement of facts cannot be considered. Texas, etc., v. Gonzales (Tex. Civ. App.) 211 S. W. 347; Scaling v. Collins (Tex. Civ. App.) 214 S. W. 624.

In the absence of a statement of facts, is must be presumed that the evidence supported the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swift & Co. v. J. B. Jeffrey & Son, 250 S.W. 791, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 98 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

250 S.W. 791 (Swift & Co. v. J. B. Jeffrey & Son) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Magee v. Magee
272 S.W. 252 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)