Swift and Company v. Doris Ann Queen

Sixth Circuit

Swift and Company v. Doris Ann Queen

286 F.2d 169

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 15, 1960·No. 14215·Published

Opinion

ORDER.

In this case, judgment in the amount of $33,000, in favor of the plaintiff, Doris Ann Queen, was entered upon the verdict of a jury in a case tried before Judge O’Sullivan.

The case really presented only a fact issue as to whether the appellant, Swift and Company, was guilty of substantial negligence in the operation of its truck, which proximately caused the accident in which appellee was injured.

We think that there is ample substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no reversible error was committed in the trial of the case.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER.

In this case, judgment in the amount of $33,000, in favor of the plaintiff, Doris Ann Queen, was entered upon the verdict of a jury in a case tried before Judge O’Sullivan.

The case really presented only a fact issue as to whether the appellant, Swift and Company, was guilty of substantial negligence in the operation of its truck, which proximately caused the accident in which appellee was injured.

We think that there is ample substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no reversible error was committed in the trial of the case.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Swift and Company v. Doris Ann Queen, 286 F.2d 169 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

286 F.2d 169 (Swift and Company v. Doris Ann Queen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.