Swidler v. Knocklong Corp.

115 N.E.2d 828, 306 N.Y. 600, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 897
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument and stay denied, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by the addition of the following: A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by the Court of Appeals, viz.: Whether the judgment herein, by permitting, as claimed by plaintiffs, the prior partition action judgment to validate the tax deed which had been obtained without notice to the owners, although the order for service by publication of the summons in the partition action dispensed with mailing the summons, constituted the taking of property without due process of law, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. The Court of Appeals held that there was no such violation. [See 305 N. Y. 527.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swidler v. Knocklong Corp., 115 N.E.2d 828, 306 N.Y. 600, 1953 N.Y. LEXIS 897 (N.Y. 1953).

115 N.E.2d 828 (Swidler v. Knocklong Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fernandez v. State Liquor Authority
115 N.E.2d 829 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)