Swiderski v. Citizens National Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Swiderski v. Citizens National Bank

708 So. 2d 689, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4339, 1998 WL 199350

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 1998

DocketNo. 97-1335

StatusPublished

This text of 708 So. 2d 689 (Swiderski v. Citizens National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swiderski v. Citizens National Bank, 708 So. 2d 689, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4339, 1998 WL 199350 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Joseph Swidersld, appeals from a final judgment rendered on motions to dismiss and for summary judgment filed by the defendant below, Citizens National [690]*690Bank of Leesburg, against his multi-count complaint. We affirm the trial court’s judgment in all respects except for the entry of a summary judgment on Count V of Swider-ski’s complaint wherein he alleged that Citizens breached its contract to extend lines of credit to him for two residential developments. Swiderski claims the bank “unilaterally” restricted the number of homes to be financed at a given time before a mutual modification of the contracts whereby Swid-erski agreed to the reduction. As to this count, we find that there was a sufficient factual conflict raised below to preclude summary judgment.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Joseph Swidersld, appeals from a final judgment rendered on motions to dismiss and for summary judgment filed by the defendant below, Citizens National [690]*690Bank of Leesburg, against his multi-count complaint. We affirm the trial court’s judgment in all respects except for the entry of a summary judgment on Count V of Swider-ski’s complaint wherein he alleged that Citizens breached its contract to extend lines of credit to him for two residential developments. Swiderski claims the bank “unilaterally” restricted the number of homes to be financed at a given time before a mutual modification of the contracts whereby Swid-erski agreed to the reduction. As to this count, we find that there was a sufficient factual conflict raised below to preclude summary judgment.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

708 So. 2d 689, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4339, 1998 WL 199350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swiderski-v-citizens-national-bank-fladistctapp-1998.