Swezey v. Okonagon Cnty Jail

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Washington
DecidedMarch 10, 2020
Docket2:19-cv-00372
StatusUnknown

This text of Swezey v. Okonagon Cnty Jail (Swezey v. Okonagon Cnty Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swezey v. Okonagon Cnty Jail, (E.D. Wash. 2020).

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6

7 STEPHEN LEE SWEZEY, NO: 2:19-CV-0372-TOR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 9 v. PREJUDICE

10 OKANAGON COUNTY JAIL, KUSH, RANDY KLINE and JOHN 11 DEVON,

12 Defendants.

14 BEFORE THE COURT is the Court’s Order to Comply with Filing Fee 15 Requirements. ECF No. 4. The Court has reviewed the record and files herein and 16 is fully informed. For the reasons discussed below, this action is dismissed without 17 prejudice. 18 On October 30, 2019, Plaintiff, then a prisoner at the Spokane County 19 Detention Services, filed a pro se civil rights complaint without paying the filing fee 20 or seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but simply asking the Court to accept 1 his case without the filing fee. ECF No. 1-2. Plaintiff did not comply with 28 U.S.C. 2 § 1915(a)(2), which requires a prisoner seeking to bring a civil action without

3 prepayment of the filing fee to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account 4 statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six months immediately preceding the 5 filing of the complaint.

6 Plaintiff was advised of the deficiencies concerning his request to proceed 7 without prepayment of the filing fee, including the requirement that he keep the 8 Court advised on any change of address. ECF No. 3. He did not cure these 9 deficiencies and filed nothing further in this action.

10 Plaintiff was advised that before the Court may proceed with his civil action, 11 he must either pay the applicable fee of $400.00 ($350.00 filing fee, plus $50.00 12 administrative fee) or comply with the in forma pauperis statute. ECF No. 4.

13 Plaintiff was further advised that failure to do either within 21 days would result in 14 the dismissal of this case. Id. ECF No. 4 was returned to the Court as undeliverable, 15 as Plaintiff was no longer in custody, and he has not provided the Court with any 16 change of address. ECF No. 5. No filing fee has been paid or in forma pauperis

17 application filed. 18 Parties filing actions in the United States District Court are required to pay 19 filing fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed without the immediate

20 payment of a filing fee only upon granting of in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Failure to pay the statutory filing fee will result in dismissal of these actions 2|| without prejudice. See Olivares y. Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th Cir. 1995) 3|| (district court has authority to dismiss without prejudice prisoner complaint for failure to pay partial filing fee); In re Perroton, 958 F.2d 889, 890 (9th Cir. 1992) 5|| (affirming dismissal of appeal of pro se litigant for failure to pay required filing 6|| fees). 7\| ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 8 This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to pay the filing fee or filing a properly completed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis pursuant 10]} to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a). 11 The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order, enter judgment 12]| accordingly, furnish a copy to Plaintiff at his last known address, and CLOSE the 13]| file. 14 DATED March 10, 2020. A kai Oa LW 0 Kee 16 amie eo HOMAS 0. RICE □□□ Chief United States District Judge 17 18 19 20

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Swezey v. Okonagon Cnty Jail, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swezey-v-okonagon-cnty-jail-waed-2020.