Swett v. Mohlis

Supreme Court of Iowa

Swett v. Mohlis

38 Iowa 698

DecidedJune 19, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Iowa 698 (Swett v. Mohlis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swett v. Mohlis, 38 Iowa 698 (iowa 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Miller, Oh. J.

— The defendants and appellants set up in their answer that the note sued on was given without consideration, and was obtained from defendants by fraud, and that the subject matter of the suit was adjudicated in a former suit. The entire argument of appellants’ counsel is devoted to a discussion of the evidence in the case. The evidence, although somewhat conflicting, fully sustains the verdict. The judgment, therefore, will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller, Oh. J.

— The defendants and appellants set up in their answer that the note sued on was given without consideration, and was obtained from defendants by fraud, and that the subject matter of the suit was adjudicated in a former suit. The entire argument of appellants’ counsel is devoted to a discussion of the evidence in the case. The evidence, although somewhat conflicting, fully sustains the verdict. The judgment, therefore, will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Iowa 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swett-v-mohlis-iowa-1874.