Swett Urquieta v. Bowe

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 5, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-01379·Unknown

Opinion

ST. JOHN’S UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF Law Prof. Jennifer Baum St. Vincent de Paul Legal Program St. John’s University School of Law Child Advocacy Clinic 8000 Utopia Parkway Jamaica, NY 11439 . T (718) 990-1424 April 5, 2024 F (718) 990-1961 C (718) 578-2286 By ECF baumj@stjohns.edu Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Room 1305 New York, NY 10007 Re: Swett Urquieta v. Bowe, 24-cv-1379 (SDNY) (PAE) (Letter Motion to File Sealed Exhibit) To the Court: I write as the Court-appointed attorney for the minor child S.B.S. in the above-entitled action, pursuant to this Court’s Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases (rev. 2021) Rule 4.B.2., seeking Court approval to file a Summary of the Child’s Position, discussed at yesterday’s Conference, in redacted form in its entirety. The proposed filing relates directly to the child’s upcoming in camera testimony, which itself will be sealed. Permitting indiscriminate public inspection of the proposed filing describing that expected testimony is neither warranted nor advised, for the health and safety of the eleven year old child, who is not a party to this action, and who has already expressed, through counsel, significant anxiety and embarrassment over the possibility of public inspection of this case and its record. This Court has already recognized the need to protect the child from public scrutiny during his testimony about the deeply personal family and health matters that are the subject of this litigation, by Ordering that his actual testimony be shielded from the public. The requested redaction merely extends that same protection to this non-evidentiary summary of that expected testimony. See, Robinson v. De Niro, 2023 WL 3728350 (SDNY), *2 (permitting redaction of documents that could be used to significantly intrude on personal privacy interests, especially in cases that attract media attention and involve innocent third parties such as non-party children). Respectfully, GRANTED. . & ‘ SO ORDERED. f wh ennifer\Baum, Esq. PAUL A. ENGEZMA United States District Judge April 5, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swett Urquieta v. Bowe, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Swett Urquieta v. Bowe (Swett Urquieta v. Bowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.