Swetlow v. Zindorest Park, Inc.
202 Misc. 628, 116 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1839
Opinion
While the direction of a verdict for plaintiffs as matter of law was proper (General Business Law, § 201), the issue of damages was for the jury.
The judgment should be modified by directing judgments for plaintiffs and remitting the case to the court below for the assessment of damages, with costs.
Hammer, Hopstadter and Schreiber, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Swetlow v. Zindorest Park, Inc., 202 Misc. 628, 116 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1952 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1839 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1952).
202 Misc. 628 (Swetlow v. Zindorest Park, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aldrich v. Waldorf Astoria Hotel, Inc.
74 Misc. 2d 413 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1973)