Swersky v. A. Greene & Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Swersky v. A. Greene & Co.

189 N.E.2d 104, 12 N.Y.2d 952

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 21, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 N.E.2d 104 (Swersky v. A. Greene & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swersky v. A. Greene & Co., 189 N.E.2d 104, 12 N.Y.2d 952 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis and SdLEPPi. Judges Fund, Bubble and Foster dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial on the ground that a question of fact is presented as to whether the crane operator and oiler were employees of the crane owner, Welsch, at the time of the accident (Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contr, Co., 245 N. Y. 66; Kristiansen v. Wagner’s Steel Erectors, 295 N. Y. 668).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis and SdLEPPi. Judges Fund, Bubble and Foster dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial on the ground that a question of fact is presented as to whether the crane operator and oiler were employees of the crane owner, Welsch, at the time of the accident (Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contr, Co., 245 N. Y. 66; Kristiansen v. Wagner’s Steel Erectors, 295 N. Y. 668).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 N.E.2d 104, 12 N.Y.2d 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swersky-v-a-greene-co-ny-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack