Swepson v. . Turner
This text of 76 N.C. 115 (Swepson v. . Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The salaries of the officers and the pay of the; employees of the government, are to enable them to serve; the government. And their expectations pr their rights-, against the government for payment for services rendered orto be rendered, are not subject to any judicial process at the instance of their creditors. This is so from public policy,, else it might be in the power of creditors to embarrass the; government. This is so manifest and so well supported by-authorities that it is unnecessary to elaborate it. Buchanan v. Alexander, 4 How. U. S. R. 20. Bliss v. Lawrence, 58 N. Y. 445. Bank of Tennessee v. Debrell, 3 Sneed, 379. Buckly v. Eckert, 3 Penn. 368.
There is error. This -will be certified.
Pee, Cueiam. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 N.C. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swepson-v-turner-nc-1877.