Swenson v. Sawoska

564 A.2d 1073, 212 Conn. 810, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 275
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 27, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 18 Conn. App. 597, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the admission of the officer’s narrative of how the accident occurred contained in the police report was harmless error?

“2. Was the standard of harmless error used by the Appellate Court, ‘sufficient other evidence to support the verdict,’ erroneous?

“3. Does the other evidence properly admitted, including the diagram, render harmless any error in the admission of the officer’s narrative?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swenson v. Sawoska, 564 A.2d 1073, 212 Conn. 810, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 275 (Colo. 1989).

564 A.2d 1073 (Swenson v. Sawoska) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swenson v. Sawoska
575 A.2d 206 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)