Swenson v. Sawoska
This text of 564 A.2d 1073 (Swenson v. Sawoska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 18 Conn. App. 597, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the admission of the officer’s narrative of how the accident occurred contained in the police report was harmless error?
“2. Was the standard of harmless error used by the Appellate Court, ‘sufficient other evidence to support the verdict,’ erroneous?
“3. Does the other evidence properly admitted, including the diagram, render harmless any error in the admission of the officer’s narrative?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
564 A.2d 1073, 212 Conn. 810, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swenson-v-sawoska-conn-1989.