Swenson v. LaCoss
This text of 544 So. 2d 345 (Swenson v. LaCoss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON REHEARING
We grant appellees’ motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion of April 26, 1989, and substitute the following revised opinion:
We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for judgment in accordance with her motions for a directed verdict and for a new trial.
We reverse the final judgment entered in favor of appellees, Claire R. LaCoss, L.C. Judd & Co., Inc. and John Tatum on appellant’s claim for medical expenses in excess of her personal injury protection coverage. We remand this case to the trial court with instructions to enter judgment in favor of [346]*346appellant, Kathleen Swenson, and against appellees in an amount to be determined pursuant to the stipulation counsel made during trial.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
544 So. 2d 345, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1425, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3415, 1989 WL 64698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swenson-v-lacoss-fladistctapp-1989.