Swendra v. Oc-Unk, Inc.

134 A.D.2d 905, 522 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51101
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 134 A.D.2d 905 (Swendra v. Oc-Unk, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swendra v. Oc-Unk, Inc., 134 A.D.2d 905, 522 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51101 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and defendant Niagara Frontier’s motion granted. Memorandum: The court erred in denying the motion of defendant Niagara Frontier Transit Metro System, Inc. (NFT) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The record demonstrates that plaintiff was injured after alighting from a bus owned and operated by NFT when he walked in front of the stationary bus to cross the street and was struck by a truck owned and operated by the codefendants. A common carrier’s duty to its passenger is discharged when it affords the passenger a safe place to alight (Blye v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 124 AD2d 106; Ortola v Bouvier, 110 AD2d 1077). Since it is undisputed that plaintiff safely alighted from the bus before attempting to cross the street, NFT cannot be held liable. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ricotta, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D.2d 905, 522 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swendra-v-oc-unk-inc-nyappdiv-1987.