Sweitzer v. Thomas

870 So. 2d 791, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 143, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 461, 2004 WL 583182
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 25, 2004·No. No. SC03-165·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Sweitzer v. Thomas, 834 So.2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), a decision alleged to be in express and direct conflict with Loring v. Winters, 802 So.2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sweitzer v. Thomas, 870 So. 2d 791, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 143, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 461, 2004 WL 583182 (Fla. 2004).

870 So. 2d 791 (Sweitzer v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sweitzer v. Thomas
834 So. 2d 283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Loring v. Winters
802 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)