Sweikata v. Walden Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sweikata v. Walden Savings Bank

31 A.D.2d 965, 299 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4363

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 965 (Sweikata v. Walden Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sweikata v. Walden Savings Bank, 31 A.D.2d 965, 299 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4363 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from two orders of the Supreme 'Court, Orange ¡County, one dated February 27, 1968, which denied plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint and bill of particulars, and one dated April 9, 1968, which granted plaintiff’s motion for reargument as to amending the bill of particulars, but adhered to the original decision. Appeal dismissed insofar as it is from the order of February 27, 1968 and from the portion of the .order of April 9; 1968 which granted reargument. With respect to the first order, the appeal has been abandoned as to the denial of leave to amend the complaint; and the remainder of the order was superseded by the second order, which granted reargument. As to said portion .of the second order, appellant is not aggrieved by the granting of reargument and has also abandoned the appeal therefrom. Order dated April 9, 1968 affirmed in all other respects. No opinion. Respondents are allowed a joint bill of $10 costs and disbursements. ¡Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Munder and Martascello, J'J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from two orders of the Supreme 'Court, Orange ¡County, one dated February 27, 1968, which denied plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint and bill of particulars, and one dated April 9, 1968, which granted plaintiff’s motion for reargument as to amending the bill of particulars, but adhered to the original decision. Appeal dismissed insofar as it is from the order of February 27, 1968 and from the portion of the .order of April 9; 1968 which granted reargument. With respect to the first order, the appeal has been abandoned as to the denial of leave to amend the complaint; and the remainder of the order was superseded by the second order, which granted reargument. As to said portion .of the second order, appellant is not aggrieved by the granting of reargument and has also abandoned the appeal therefrom. Order dated April 9, 1968 affirmed in all other respects. No opinion. Respondents are allowed a joint bill of $10 costs and disbursements. ¡Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Munder and Martascello, J'J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 965, 299 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweikata-v-walden-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack