Sweigert v. Finley

York County Court of Common Pleas

Sweigert v. Finley

22 A. 702, 144 Pa. 266, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 607

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County

DecidedOctober 5, 1891

DocketNo. 9

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A. 702 (Sweigert v. Finley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sweigert v. Finley, 22 A. 702, 144 Pa. 266, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 607 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam; :

The court below properly instructed the jury that there could [269]*269be no recovery for the horse, wagon, harness, and forks, for the reason that there was not sufficient evidence of their sale and delivery by William Lesh to the plaintiff. The question of the ownership of the iron was fairly submitted to the jury under adequate instructions. An examination of the numerous assignments fails to disclose error. The case is not important, either as to the principles involved or the amount in controversy.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam; :

The court below properly instructed the jury that there could [269]*269be no recovery for the horse, wagon, harness, and forks, for the reason that there was not sufficient evidence of their sale and delivery by William Lesh to the plaintiff. The question of the ownership of the iron was fairly submitted to the jury under adequate instructions. An examination of the numerous assignments fails to disclose error. The case is not important, either as to the principles involved or the amount in controversy.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A. 702, 144 Pa. 266, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweigert-v-finley-pactcomplyork-1891.