Sweezy v. O'Rourke
173 A.D. 947
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 173 A.D. 947 (Sweezy v. O'Rourke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sweezy v. O'Rourke, 173 A.D. 947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
The contract contemplated that plaintiff should sink the well until gravel-bearing fresh water was reached. It conclusively appears that he failed to perform his contract in this respect. Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
173 A.D. 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweezy-v-orourke-nyappdiv-1916.