Sweetwater Rug Corp. v. J. & C. Bedspread Co.
This text of 299 F.2d 573 (Sweetwater Rug Corp. v. J. & C. Bedspread Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs’ action sought (1) a declaration that two United States patents issued to Joseph K. MeCutcheon are invalid and not infringed; (2) an order restraining defendant from threatening or issuing warning notices to the trade or to customers or suppliers or associates of plaintiffs; and (3) an accounting for damages and profits. Defendant moved to dismiss the action for lack of an indispensable party, namely, the patentee. In a well reasoned opinion Judge Her-lands granted the motion.
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion below, 198 F.Supp. 941.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 F.2d 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweetwater-rug-corp-v-j-c-bedspread-co-ca2-1962.