Sweetser v. Kenney

31 Me. 288
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1850·Published

Opinion

Shepley, C. J.

In the case cited from Metcalf, the decision put an end to the whole controversy, so that it was known which party had finally prevailed. And that party, under the statute, as the prevailing party, was entitled to [289]*289costs. In this case neither party has finally prevailed. The suit is not terminated ; it is, in effect, merely remitted to the District Court for further proceedings. How could costs be taxed ? From the commencement of the suit ? That is not pretended. And there is no rule for taxing by parts. Neither party has yet prevailed, and no costs, in this stage of the case, can be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sweetser v. Kenney, 31 Me. 288 (Me. 1850).

31 Me. 288 (Sweetser v. Kenney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.