Sweet v. Soorbeck

Rhode Island Vice Admiralty Court

Sweet v. Soorbeck

1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 439

DecidedOctober 2, 1747

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 439 (Sweet v. Soorbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Rhode Island Vice Admiralty Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sweet v. Soorbeck, 1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 439 (R.I. Super. Ct. 1747).

Pincite

Opinion

I Having duly Considered the Preparatory Examination and all the Papers and writings deliver’d by the Cap* of the Privateer to the master of the Prize and also the depositions given in open Court and Likewise weighed the arguments of the advocates as well on the part of the Captor as on the part of the Claimant. It appears to me that the Sloop and Cargo was not the Property of the Subjects of the King of Spain as Sett forth in Said Libel But the Property of Persons Living at the Island of Curracoa and Subjects of the States General. I do therefore Acquit Said Sloop and Cargo

Chambers Russell Judge of Admiralty

[Admiralty Papers, V, 134]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I Having duly Considered the Preparatory Examination and all the Papers and writings deliver’d by the Cap* of the Privateer to the master of the Prize and also the depositions given in open Court and Likewise weighed the arguments of the advocates as well on the part of the Captor as on the part of the Claimant. It appears to me that the Sloop and Cargo was not the Property of the Subjects of the King of Spain as Sett forth in Said Libel But the Property of Persons Living at the Island of Curracoa and Subjects of the States General. I do therefore Acquit Said Sloop and Cargo

Chambers Russell Judge of Admiralty

[Admiralty Papers, V, 134]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Rec. V.A. Ct. (R.I.) 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweet-v-soorbeck-riviceadmct-1747.