Sweet v. Schiller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sweet v. Schiller

271 A.D.2d 450, 706 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3787

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 271 A.D.2d 450 (Sweet v. Schiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sweet v. Schiller, 271 A.D.2d 450, 706 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 for the appointment of a guardian, David Schiller appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rossetti, J.), entered April 26, 1999, which denied his motion to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that the Supreme Court lacks subject matter and personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, the Supreme Court has subject matter and personal jurisdiction in this proceeding (see, Mental Hygiene Law §§ 81.04, 81.05, 81.07; Matter of Eichner, 73 AD2d 431, mod 52 NY2d 363, cert denied sub nom. Storar v Storar, 454 US 858). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 for the appointment of a guardian, David Schiller appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rossetti, J.), entered April 26, 1999, which denied his motion to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that the Supreme Court lacks subject matter and personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, the Supreme Court has subject matter and personal jurisdiction in this proceeding (see, Mental Hygiene Law §§ 81.04, 81.05, 81.07; Matter of Eichner, 73 AD2d 431, mod 52 NY2d 363, cert denied sub nom. Storar v Storar, 454 US 858). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 450, 706 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweet-v-schiller-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack