Sweet v. Providence & Springfield Railroad
This text of 40 A. 237 (Sweet v. Providence & Springfield Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think the circumstances of the accident, which resulted in the death of the plaintiff’s infant intestate, are such that the question of contributory negligence was properly left to the jury. 2 Wood on Bailway Law, § 320 ; Patterson’s Bailway Accident Law, pp. 51, 54, 55, 197. We are not satisfied that the verdict of the jury ought to be set aside.
We think the court did not err in allowing the introduction of the Carlisle Life Tables. Schell v. Plumb, 55 N. Y. 592; Sauter v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. Co., 66 N. Y. 50; Rowley v. London & N. W. Railway, L. R. 8 Exchq. 221; Georgia R. R. Co., &c., v. Oaks, 52 Ga. 410. New trial denied and petition dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A. 237, 20 R.I. 785, 1890 R.I. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweet-v-providence-springfield-railroad-ri-1890.