Sweet v. Norris
This text of 19 Abb. N. Cas. 150 (Sweet v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The limitations of time prescribed in section 572, are to prevent a plaintiff, having a defendant in [152]*152actual or constructive imprisonment under an order of arrest, from continuing his imprisonment indefinitely by delaying the entry of his judgment, or by delaying to issue his execution. Before the amendment to this section, plaintiffs sometimes omitted to enter their judgments or to issue their executions for a long period, and thus held the defendants in actual or constructive imprisonment under such order, and it was for the purpose of preventing this abuse that this section was amended.
Under an execution for the collection of less than $500 a defendant may be discharged at any time by giving fourteen days’ notice, and surrendering all his property not exempt by law from execution (Code Civ. Pro. §§ 2202, 2205), and he cannot be imprisoned more than three months (Ib. § 111).
The motion is denied with costs.
See Levy v. Salomon, ante, p. 52
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Abb. N. Cas. 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweet-v-norris-nysupct-1887.