Sweet v. Merki

27 Ill. App. 245, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 506
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedSeptember 18, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 27 Ill. App. 245 (Sweet v. Merki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sweet v. Merki, 27 Ill. App. 245, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 506 (Ill. Ct. App. 1888).

Opinion

Moran, P. J.

This writ of error was brought to review the action of the court in entering a judgment by confession.

From a supplemental record which has been filed, it appears that, on motion of plaintiff in error, the court has granted him leave -to plead, the judgment entered to stand as security till the merits are tried. It thus appears that material issues in the case stand open for adjustment in a future trial, and that the controversy between the parties is not finally determined. A final judgment is one that puts an end to the action so that nothing remains to be done but to execute the judgment.

The record discloses that no final judgment had been entered in this case. There is no jurisdiction, therefore, in this court to review the record at this stage in the case, and the writ of error must be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steward v. Parsons
112 Ill. App. 611 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1904)
Gramm v. Fisher
29 P. 377 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Ill. App. 245, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweet-v-merki-illappct-1888.