Sweet v. Financial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

606 So. 2d 1280, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11547, 1992 WL 322988
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1992·No. No. 92-1224·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

We find the trial court abused its discretion in changing venue from Orange County to Dade county. The complaint alleged, among other counts, contractual indemnity relating to credits for impact fees. This case is controlled by Sundor Brands, Inc. v. Groves Co., Inc., 604 So.2d 901 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sweet v. Financial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 606 So. 2d 1280, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11547, 1992 WL 322988 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

606 So. 2d 1280 (Sweet v. Financial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moreno v. Moreno
606 So. 2d 1280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)