Sweet Surrender, Inc. v. American Bagel Co.

979 S.W.2d 211, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1676, 1998 WL 643299
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 22, 1998
DocketNo. 73477
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 979 S.W.2d 211 (Sweet Surrender, Inc. v. American Bagel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sweet Surrender, Inc. v. American Bagel Co., 979 S.W.2d 211, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1676, 1998 WL 643299 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sweet Surrender, Inc. (Surrender) appeals from the trial court’s granting of the motion to dismiss filed by The American Bagel Company, d/b/a Chesapeake Bagel Bakery System (Bagel). Bagel urged the court had no subject matter jurisdiction due to the forum selection clauses contained in the agreements between these parties.

Forum selection clauses should be enforced “unless it is unfair or unreasonable to do so.” High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 823 S.W.2d 493, 494 (Mo. banc 1992).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burke v. Goodman
114 S.W.3d 276 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
979 S.W.2d 211, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1676, 1998 WL 643299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweet-surrender-inc-v-american-bagel-co-moctapp-1998.