Sweet, Dempster & Co. v. Field

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Sweet, Dempster & Co. v. Field

1903 OK 99, 74 P. 1135, 13 Okla. 257, 1903 Okla. LEXIS 77

DecidedSeptember 10, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 1903 OK 99 (Sweet, Dempster & Co. v. Field) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sweet, Dempster & Co. v. Field, 1903 OK 99, 74 P. 1135, 13 Okla. 257, 1903 Okla. LEXIS 77 (Okla. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

*258 Opinion of the court by

BeauciiaMp, J.:

The facts in these cases are identical with the facts in the case of J. Foster & Company v. Field & Saxton et al., No. 1271, also pending in this court, save that in that case suit was begun before the appointment of a receiver, and in these four cases suit was begun afterwards, no attachment having been sued out or levied in any of them. The decision and opinion in the case No. 1271, just decided, necessarily disposes of these cases, and the order of the district court of Pottawatomie county sustaining the demurrer and the judgment for costs against plaintiffs in error is affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs in error.

Hainer, J., who presided in the court below, and Bur-well, J., not sitting; Gillette, J., absent; all the other Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*258 Opinion of the court by

BeauciiaMp, J.:

The facts in these cases are identical with the facts in the case of J. Foster & Company v. Field & Saxton et al., No. 1271, also pending in this court, save that in that case suit was begun before the appointment of a receiver, and in these four cases suit was begun afterwards, no attachment having been sued out or levied in any of them. The decision and opinion in the case No. 1271, just decided, necessarily disposes of these cases, and the order of the district court of Pottawatomie county sustaining the demurrer and the judgment for costs against plaintiffs in error is affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs in error.

Hainer, J., who presided in the court below, and Bur-well, J., not sitting; Gillette, J., absent; all the other Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1903 OK 99, 74 P. 1135, 13 Okla. 257, 1903 Okla. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweet-dempster-co-v-field-okla-1903.