SWEET AIR INVESTMENT, INC. v. Kenney
742 N.W.2d 114, 480 Mich. 990
This text of 742 N.W.2d 114 (SWEET AIR INVESTMENT, INC. v. Kenney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
SWEET AIR INVESTMENT, INC. v. Kenney, 742 N.W.2d 114, 480 Mich. 990 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
SWEET AIR INVESTMENT, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
Linda L. KENNEY a/k/a Linda L. Disanto, Frank Disanto, individually and as Trustee and Beneficiary of the Frank J. Disanto Revocable Living Trust, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and WEAVER, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mullen v. Zerfas
742 N.W.2d 114 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
742 N.W.2d 114, 480 Mich. 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweet-air-investment-inc-v-kenney-mich-2007.