Sweeny v. Barbin
2 Mart. 48
Opinion
By the Court,
alone. Neither party can, without his neglect or consent, be deprived of his right to a jury. No latches can be imputed to the defendant. Judgment cannot be cntered. If the plaintiffs wave their right to a jury, the defendant must be allowed to pray for one, or his attorney offered an opportunity of consulting with him, to ascertain whether a defence be not necessary.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sweeny v. Barbin, 2 Mart. 48 (La. 1811).
2 Mart. 48 (Sweeny v. Barbin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Putnam & Norman v. Levee
156 So. 189 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1934)
Allworth v. Interstate Consol. Railway Co.
60 A. 884 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1905)