Sweeney v. Webb

Texas Supreme Court

Sweeney v. Webb

77 S.W. 1135, 97 Tex. 250, 1904 Tex. LEXIS 141

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 14, 1904

DocketNo. 3987.

StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.W. 1135 (Sweeney v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sweeney v. Webb, 77 S.W. 1135, 97 Tex. 250, 1904 Tex. LEXIS 141 (Tex. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

GAINES, Chief Justice.

We think the application for the writ of error in this case should be refused. But in order to prevent misconception we deem it proper to say, that we have not found it necessary to pass upon the question whether, if the statute in controversy had been unconstitutional, the plaintiffs were entitled to the remedy of injunction. The determination of that question not being requisite to a decision of the case we give no opinion upon it.

Writ of error refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GAINES, Chief Justice.

We think the application for the writ of error in this case should be refused. But in order to prevent misconception we deem it proper to say, that we have not found it necessary to pass upon the question whether, if the statute in controversy had been unconstitutional, the plaintiffs were entitled to the remedy of injunction. The determination of that question not being requisite to a decision of the case we give no opinion upon it.

Writ of error refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.W. 1135, 97 Tex. 250, 1904 Tex. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sweeney-v-webb-tex-1904.